Tuesday, 10 February 2009
-
Why Some Countries Should Not Get Fast Food Restaurants
Current me if I'm wrong but majority of Americans (and foreigners that have fast food joints littered across their nation) have tasted a Big Mac or a Whopper.
And I'm sure majority of those people have their favorite, unless you go to a country where no such thing exists. Take a look:
Are countries without fast food restaurants healthier than those with them? Which burger tastes better, the whopper or big mac?
*If you have a video that relates to health, food or fitness, send us the link here.
healthkicker.com
-
recommend
- recs 1
-
share
-
email
- sent 0
Related Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to healthkicker's Healthkicker Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in healthkicker's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
Comments (14)
That video was hilarious!
No, they do not need fast food joints. Especially not like McDonald's or Burger King. Send them a Subway or something.
I dont have burgers from McDonalds, Burger King etc,
I sometimes have chicken nuggets from a fast food eating place, but this is a treat.
Ya know actually On Oprah the other day she had someone from a far off African country where it's sexy to be big and they dont have any fast food restraunts. They are actaully forced as little girls, in some villages because its mostly frowned upon, to eat until they throw up and then are immediately given more food.
It was the weirdest thing ever.
But I do think if there wasn't an option, we wouldn't be as fat lol I know if there are fattening foods in my house and I'm on a diet, I will more than likely binge on that stuff.
America doesn't need fast food places... but it's kind of too late.
(Your video is inaccessible to anyone outside the U.S. Just thought you might want to know. Kind of silly, really, since I've seen the commercial on TV!)
Neither of those burgers; sonic for the win.
The countries with the 10 lowest rates for healthy life expectancy are Sierra Leone, Malawi, Zambia, Niger, Botswana, Afghanistan, Lesotho, Burundi, Rwanda, and Swaziland. None of them have a McDonalds (or any other fast food I assume). So, no, they're not more healthy.
And I don't know which tastes better, because I've never had either. :)
Just because they don't have fast food restaurants doesn't mean they eat healthier. Just because the cow is in one form here doesn't mean it can't be in another. There will always be an unhealthy meal anywhere, no matter what it consists of.
The only way to eat "healthier" is by consumption by volume. Someone can get 10 lbs heavier after one meal while someone else can eat 3 meals in one sitting and not gain any. It depends on the metabolism, exercise rate and meal volume for each person.
I'd say the whopper. With extra tomato and pickles.
I'm not big into fast food, but I'll eat it occasionally. No cheese on any of those fast food burgers... it tastes like plastic to me. The more veggies on them the better
Hmm.... I'm torn between the two.
Countries that don't have fast food places may or may not be more healthy than countries that have fast food places.
Of those two choices, I wouldn't want either. If I was about to die, I would take the Whopper.
that was funny as a mother.
Lol. That video is hilarious.
yes i think that would play a role actually.
The Whopper Virgin commercials were dumber than anything, but the SNL spoof was funny