Friday, 03 December 2010
-
The Cancer Cure THEY Don't Want You To Know About
Oh, the dreaded "C" word. Cancer. It affects so many people over the courses of their lives. If you have a body, you have the potential to get cancer, and that's all there is to it. Or is this true at all?The truth of the matter is that "cancer treatment," as it exists today, means there is no cure for cancer. It might send it into remission, but it's sure to come back later. Does your physician care? Didn't think so. As long as he can just send your cancer into remission, you become a slave to him, forking over your hard-earned money to not only him, but Big Pharma as well. And you know the FDA wouldn't approve such a "cure" because they'd lose profits too. They all work together, as you already know.
So of course, you have your standard cancer treatment: chemotherapy, radiation, surgery. All of these things do a number to your body, and quite frankly, the after effects of each of these can be quite devastating, and can be worse than suffering from the disease itself (and sometimes your left with so little function, that your quality of life is zero, and honestly it would be preferable to die).
So what then can you do to prevent cancer? See a doctor for regular checkups? Nah, that doesn't work. But what does work are a couple of things so common and so inexpensive that the FDA doesn't want you to know about them, and would never approve them for any reason. Let's talk about these things here, but first it helps to know that cancer is nothing more than a disease caused by a nutritional deficiency. A deficiency in a nutrient pretty much nobody gets enough of, and is responsible for our high cancer rates today. Then we'll look at something else that has a chemical property that has been shown effective in treating breast and prostate cancers, the two most common cancers in women and men, respectively.
First off, they taste terrible, and you've been brainwashed into thinking eating so much as one of them is going to kill you. In reality, in moderation they are perfectly safe and are absolutely deadly to cancer cells. What are they? Apricot kernels. The truth of the matter is they don't have anywhere near enough cyanide in them to kill you. Further, they have something else in them that is censored by the FDA constantly, and the FDA claims (erroneously, and in their best financial interests) that it's ineffective at curing cancer. It's something called Vitamin B-17. Cancer is caused by a deficiency of Vitamin B-17. Get enough, and you absolutely cannot get cancer, so load up on those apricot kernels, even though they taste totally revolting. Alas, some of the things that are the best for your body, taste the worst. It's just how it works.
Next is something that's been shown to be promising in the treatment of breast and prostate cancers. It's a compound called Xanthohumol. Where can you get it? Xanthohumol is a compound found in hops. Hops are the female flower parts (they look like mini pine cones) that are found on plants of the Humulus genus. Hops have a very bitter taste, and are most well known for being used as a flavoring agent in beer. So drink up (in moderation), and be sure to choose heavily hopped beers such as IPAs or Barleywines for the maximum benefit.
These are all natural treatments (and cures) for cancer that they don't want to know about. They don't cost a lot, and they're effective, without all the nasty side effects. Don't be a slave to your doctor or the pharmaceutical companies. Take care of yourself.
This is your Healthkicker WhistleBlower, and you have been informed.
What do you think about this? Do you think there is a cure for cancer that "THEY" don't want you to know about? What do you think about stocking up on apricot kernels and Xanthohumol to help with cancer prevention?
RecommendRelated Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to healthkicker's Healthkicker Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in healthkicker's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
About the Author
-
- From: WhistleBlower
- Name: WhistleBlower
- About Me: Exposing the lies, corruption, and dishonest tactics that run the modern medical establishment today. I take on Big Pharma, the FDA, Physicians, etc., and hold them accountable for their dastardly deeds. Remember, you alone are responsible for your health. Take matters into your own hands rather than putting in the hands of someone who just wants your money.
Stats: This Week All Time Posts: 0 10 Views: 0 37723 Comments: 0 967 View all posts by WhistleBlower
Comments (103)
uh oh, youve just given people more reason to drink!!! lol
I heard saliva can cure cancer as well
Once again, please provide sources. I don't think anyone will take you seriously unless you can provide multiple credible sources to back up your claims.
Is this serious?
So, people like to see patients sick and suffering, just for some extra profit?
That's horrific.
I've had many cases of cancer throughout my family.
I've seen what it can do.
I've seen how devistating it can be.
And after all the pain, and suffering you have to go through, you may not even have a life to show for it afterwards.
Fuck the system. :/
@JessWantsThinspo@xanga - It's DEAD serious. Check out the book World Without Cancer, the story of Vitamin B-17 by G. Edward Griffin for more information.
ill research this one... but i am a firm believer that the body has the ability to heal itself given the proper nutrients.
Let's talk about these things here, but first it helps to know that
cancer is nothing more than a disease caused by a nutritional
deficiency. A deficiency in a nutrient pretty much nobody gets enough
of, and is responsible for our high cancer rates today. Then we'll look
at something else that has a chemical property that has been shown
effective in treating breast and prostate cancers, the two most common
cancers in women and men, respectively.
Right here is where this article loses significant credibility. It would help this article to know that cancer is not caused by a nutritional deficiency. Although it may be a factor(however not significant), cancer is generally, a class of disease in which a cell or multiple cells exhibit uncontrolled growth. There are a plethora of causes to cancer and not narrowed down to one. Most commonly, mutations that can trigger "cancer" are radiation, chemical substances(carcinogens), physical irritants(i.e continued irritation/abrasion on say...the intestinal tract by certain types of food(Guyton and Hall). Think of Celiac's Disease), hereditary , certain types of viruses, etc.
Although I have not read this book, I have read on the author, his own credibility and information on his book on the website endorsing the product, and it does not show much promise. I may try to read it if I happen to run into it just see the thinking and evidence behind his claims,but, again, doesn't not show much promise to me.
Oh, and here is some of my evidence:
Hall, and Guyton. "Genetic Control, Cell Function and Cell Reproduction: Cancer."
Medical Physiology. 11ed. 2006. Print.
"Cancer."Wikipedia. Web. (I know wiki...but I am referring to the compiled published data in the reference section)
"Cancer." MedlinePlus.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/cancer.html
Well, that's just my two cents. Just educate yourselves. :)
I'm currently in university, and for months, I have been taking a class on the biology of cancer. Firstly, I want to correct something right off the bat. Cancer is a not "a disease" - it's a GROUP of diseases. Secondly, this group of diseases is characterized by uncontrolled cell growth, where apoptosis (cell death) does not occur. The cells multiply uncontrollably.
Secondly, I love how you don't list any sources in your article! Sure, there have been some scholary articles and research connecting cancers to nutrition, certain vitamins or other factors, but they are simply theories, simply research...and you don't even cite any of these articles.
Thirdly, what gives you the right to write this misleading information? FYI, Just because you googled it, or are interested in the topic, does not mean you are an expert ;)
For SHAME, healthkicker.
@sundaysx@xanga - I fully go along with that too. As for the kernels: I have known about them since about 1996 when I was involved with natural health. I also know about the cover ups and lobbying for restrictions by the Big Pharma, along with other things like EPO.
@sundaysx@xanga -
I'm not even going to ask you how you think that works because I'm sure you have no idea. But I'll just remind you that cancer is a genetic mutation. Basically the very essence of the body (its DNA) has mutated and is growing. So the cancer isn't exactly going to snap out of it and "heal itself" because it's not even "itself" anymore.
seriously, what is the deal with these "healthkicker" articles lately? there was that article on 5 useless medical pracitces and now this?
I think this is nifty as all hell, but I'd REALLY like to see some sources to back this up before I believe it.
Why not just take the six chemicals that increase your chances of breast cancer out of cosmetics and body care products?
So basically the big phram is slowly killing us buy hiding the healing effects of natural foods and getting us to waste money on pills?
Why don't you go apply for a job with FOX News? I'm sure they'd love to have another fear-mongering jackass on their staff.
I seriously have doubts about this. For one thing, you quote no research. For another thing, I can tell you straight off that cancer is not caused by a nutritional deficiency; it's caused by genetic mutation, and although there are suggestions and supporting evidence that antioxidant can protect your cells from the oxidative damage that causes such mutation, nutritional sciences can be inaccurate at times (hence why nutritionists and forever changing their minds, why one day something is good for you and the next it could kill you).
This genetic mutation prevents the cell from apoptosis (the process of destroying itself), meaning it continues to live and multiply indefinitely.
Furthermore:
1. Vitamin B17 is actually not technically a vitamin
2. 3 separate scientific papers have found it to be ineffective against cancer
^I intend to look into these more when I have some time, which I don't right now.
Please, check your sources, particularly if it's from the internet. The internet is extremely unreliable.
I've heard that Essiac works really well. It's great for the immune system and helps to keep the body fighting.
I really don't understand why Healthkicker continues to let this bullshit get posted.
@the_rocking_of_socks@xanga - And it looks like LG is back.
There is no credible source on earth (not that you listed ANY sources, by the way) that says that cancer is caused by a nutritional deficiency. Is healthkicker trying to appeal to the crazies now?
@mycontinuity@xanga - You are awesome.
this is a fking insult to all those in the medical profession, our job is to help ppl not see them suffer......if such magical properties that u describe DOES exist then go get them for me in this magical wonderland of urs
such a bs article, im unsubscribing from healthkicker
oh hai Alex Jones is back.
silly rabbit.
Yea while idk about what actually cures cancers, I do believe that a cure has been found and then dismissed because if a cure was found profits from it would be GONE. I heard the same with cavities actually. The cure for cavaities as opposed to fillings was found, but dismissed because then dentists would be out of a job (Oral Surgeons extract wisdom teeth btw). We live in a fucked up selfish world, but Lance Armstrong did it. So theres is a way.
So when did you go to medical school? Or take a high school biology or A&P class? Because you obviously are a conspiracy theorist who knows absolutely nothing about how the body really works.